Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 17:32
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Prime Day is back July 8-11, with double the days and millions of deals - About Amazon
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Naz Reid signing new five-year contract to stay with Timberwolves - Sports Illustrated
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Do you consider yourself pretty?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Walking more may lower your risk for chronic low back pain by 23%, study suggests - KSL.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Why do I sweat a great deal while exercising the same on some days and not so much on others?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.